home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Floppyshop 2
/
Floppyshop - 2.zip
/
Floppyshop - 2.iso
/
diskmags
/
4671-5.790
/
dmg-4961
/
power
/
union.pwr
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1989-12-31
|
10KB
|
204 lines
POWER...
I saw this file in VOICES DISK MAGAZINE and thought that I'd help spread the
word of this little programmers union that is talked about in this article
as it sounds like a reasonably good idea generally and I thought that you
might be interested to read it. Being a P.D.L. owner myself (which this
union seems to be aimed against) I have commented in places. I have full
permission to re-print this article. Here we go...
>>>> THE PROGRAMMERS UNION <<<<
By
A.N. THONY
QUESTION: Are you a programmer?
A "Programmer" being someone who uses their machine to program
anything and release it under any guise - someone who either has
releases already or is working on a project with a view to releasing
it. You could be releasing it as Public Domain, Shareware,
Licenceware or indeed any of the various types available to choose
from. So, are you programmer? If the answer is yes then read on:
Do Public Domain Libraries offer you the following:
(1) Replies to all your letters
(2) Regularly tell you how your program is selling
(3) Advertise your program in their magazine advertisements
(4) Send your program to the glossies for review
Chances are you cannot answer yes to any of the above, but almost
certainly not able to answer yes to the last three.
Are you happy with the response you receive for your work? or is it a
case of once the libraries receive your work they then ignore you.
Well, there is a way of making the above four points happen plus much,
much more. All we have to do is band together and start a Programmers
Union; we can then demand the above and more. If the PDL's don't
agree then we all simply withdraw our programs from their library,
it's that simple!
Someone would have to run the Union obviously, hopefully not one
person but a sort of committee. All PDL's would receive an up-to-date
list of all members of the Union and a list of all programs ever
released by the members.
If a PDL receives a new program from anyone in the Union and they
accept the program ( acceptance is at the PDL's discretion ) then they
must follow at least the four above mentioned points - and anymore
decided on in the future. If a member gets in touch with the
committee with a complaint then the committee contacts the PDL and,
hopefully, sorts out the problem. If not, then the committee has the
power to pull every program of every Union member out of the said PDL.
Once a PDL deems a program good enough to accept into their library
then there is no reason not to adhere to the said rules. Let's go
through the four preliminary ones stated earlier.
(1) Replies to all your letters. Well, it has cost you a disk, a
jiffy bag and a stamp to send them your latest program. How many
times have you seen it accepted into a PDL and they haven't even
bothered to reply and thank you - let alone replace your disk? We can
demand, at least, a guaranteed reply with a disk replacement and a
FULL assessment of your program, whether accepted or refused.
POWER : This is more than fair. I try to send at least a catalogue
disk and a short letter to everyone that sends in one of their
own creations for inclusion in POWER P.D.
(2) Regularly tell you how your program is selling. Well, maybe not
tell you but at least keep a record of what they sell. They must have
the facility to be able to send the committee a copy of the sales for
all the titles of Union members; this would then be freely available
to members on asking.
POWER : I'm not too sure on this point. Keeping track of sales is a
much harder job than many people think.
(3) Advertise your program in their glossy ad's. Well not all PDL's
advertise in the mag's but they usually advertise somewhere or send
out updates to their customers, so we could demand that our members
are mentioned as part of their advert and over a period of adverts
every member would have been mentioned eventually.
POWER : Again, I don't really agree with this one. It is that
particular library paying for the advertising, why should we be
forced to advertise products that we may not want to advertise.
Advertising space is like gold dust to a P.D.L. and to use up
that space advertising products that aren't going to sell and
thus help cover the costs of that advert is far from ideal.
(4) Send your programs to the glossies for review; and why not? How
many times have you seen Public Domain programs reviewed in the
magazines that are a couple of years old? The magazines only review
what PDL's send them so there is no reason for the PDL's not to send
them the latest titles by Union members.
POWER : Fine, I try to send as much stuff into the mags as possible but
how can we prove that a P.D.L. has sent in a union members
creation? I have sent in LOADS of software but just like with
many of the other P.D.L.'s, only a few have been reviewed, and
when it comes to age of programs, well, I sent in POWER #16 to
ST FORMAT and then also sent in POWER #18, POWER #19 and POWER
#20 but at the time POWER #22 was released, they reviewed POWER
#16! Half a year after I had sent it in! Also, if a P.D.L. IS
honest and sends in all the unions creations they could end up
sending in tens and tens of disks every month, which, by the
way, never get returned. This could be quite costly as
remember there's always p+p too and the risk of getting a bad
rating which gives the P.D.L. a bad name.
That's just four points but there is a lot more we could do. But you
are probably wondering why the PDL's would bother. What's to stop
them all banding together and telling us to 'Sod off!'? Nothing! But
if they do and we have enough members with enough programs then we can
hold them to ransom. But, by the pure nature of the title UNION, we
must be prepared to stick together.
All it needs is a couple of programmers to start it off. Once other
programmers see what a good deal we are getting then they will be
begging to join us and receive the same form the PDL's. We are not
asking for anything special - only what we deserve for our work. We
are not about to dictate and get involved with petty arguments or ask
for anything silly; all we want is what we deserve.
But it can also work against you. Let's suppose one of our members is
a Shareware author. Let's suppose the committee receives a complaint
that the registration deal did not come up to what was promised, or it
took an excessive time to return registration disks, etc. If this is
found to be true then we could ban the member from the Union. This
would then act as a guarantee to shareware buyers. If they know they
have someone to turn to and complain then they will be more liable to
register a product that states it is a "Programmers Union" member.
They could always get in touch with the committee first and make sure
the author is a member.
You have to admit that the whole thing has hundreds of possibilities,
all of them good!
If you are a programmer of any description and you feel you would like
a better ( fairer ) deal than you are getting then get in touch and we
will start a Union. Also give us any ideas you have for rule (5)
onwards.
P.S. For all you sceptics out there; no, this is not a money making
idea. I cannot, at this point in time, see any need for charges to be
made ......................
DAVE COBBLEDICK'S FOOTNOTE:>>>>>>>
To add a brief comment about this article the ideal title for such a
Union would be 'Computer Programmers Union' or CPU for short!
If you have any feeling towards becoming a Union member then please
get in touch with VOICES! - indicate also if you would be willing to
serve as a committee member. All letters, suggestions and volunteers
will be treated with the utmost respect for anonymity until, and
whenever, such a Union comes into existence.
PDL owners are also encouraged to make their views and opinions felt
on this highly controversial subject. Letters to the usual VOICES!
address - and, again, these will be treated with respect to anonymity
if you so wish.
POWER : VOICES disk mag can be contacted at the following address:
DAVE COBBLEDICK
VOICES DISK MAG
245 ROSALIND STREET
ASHINGTON
NORTHUMBERLAND
NE63 9AZ
I too would be interested to hear peoples views and opinions of this
union, especially from some of the fellow P.D.L.'s out there. Should
we all team up like the article suggested might happen and tell this
union to "SOD OFF!" or is it a good idea which will encourage more ST
creativity in the Public Domain? Write to the normal POWER address (in
the INFO file).